What is the legal or moral reason the homosexuals might give to not allow polygamist marriage? If you say ‘none’ and you are for polygamist marriage do you realize the absolute never-ending nightmare of property and parental rights cases due to polygamist divorce? But all are consenting adults, so how dare you stop them?

If we say we must redefine historical marriage to suit some newcomers, what is then the argument to stop all newcomers? We already scrapped the historical basis, so any objections after the fact have no defense.

It is called Pandora’s box. Historically it has been left for reasons additional to the obvious (family = mommy + daddy.)

Even if you were to ’split the baby’ so to speak and say polygamists cannot jointly share property, then that is not *actually* marriage (all new faux-civil rights mobs to look forward to, bigot!)

Also, polygamy is part of a society which demeans women.

How do we stop this historical rewriting of marriage, its consequences and ensuing injustice?
The point is what is your justification for ‘discriminating’ against polygamists? Simply defining marriage as a two-person institution does not give a REASON for leaving them out. We know it would complicate the courts but that is not a LEGAL REASON. If not allowing ‘gay marriage’ is discrimination then not allowing polygamist marriage (which actually has a historical background) is discrimination also and you must find a legal reason otherwise.

Okay now before you sign him off as a paranoid psycho… just listen for a second.

I had a hard time believeing him at first, too.

It is true that whenever we are out together, we see strange looking men in business suits.

And this one time, he was in Subway, when this man-yes, you guessed it, in a business suit-came in and, without ordering, sat down at a table near him and just watched my boyfriend.

And this other time, he was using the bathroom at his school and a bald fellow in a suit came in and washed his hands and said hello to him, and called him by name.

There is no reason for a bald man in a business suit to be in a school unless he works there, and he doesn’t.

There is no reason for a bald man in a business suit to know my boyfriend’s name unless they know each other, which they do not.

What should he/we do?
He just told me this:
Today there was a woman wearing like a business type suite “observing my class”

In a civil suit, would I be able to ask for reimbursement of having to “hunt” someone down? Such as running costly reports to find information and also gas and mileage for going to places that turned out to be fraudulent business addresses?

Does anyone know the formula to determine how much to ask for gas and mileage?
And, what are the limitations of also suing for undue mental stress?

A cash advance business deposited one of my checks and it was returned insufficient funds. According to my state’s banking laws if a check is returned for insufficient funds the business is required to inform you in writing of your options to pay it off in four equal monthly installments before they take any civil action. They did not inform me of this and filed suit in court. Can I beat this in court? Since they didn’t follow state regulations, can this be dismissed?

I work part time in a mall and the food court throws out the food they did not sell that day because they can’t sell it as fresh the next day. All of them do this. Bags and bags of food. I asked why don’t they give the food to the homeless people that are hanging around. They said they can’t there is a precedence somewhere that if they choke on it or get sick that they can be sued. (I don’t understand myself why it is not true for paying customers but that is what they all tell me) The only thing they can do is take it a shelter/soup kitchen but they would have to pay the employees more to take it there daily and they are not willingly do it. I started asking around and apparently fast food places and restaurants through food out daily all around for this reason. Isn’t sad that all that food goes to waste because of so happy lawyers.

Promotional bonus paid in Oct. 05, was not made aware or signed any documentation agreeing to a pro-ratia setup. July 08, recieved court papers notifying suit against me for non-payment. They now request atty fees and % of the bonus after I left. Suit papers were my first notice of the problem. No atty letter, no business letter, no letter of intent!! They also filed suit in the wrong parish. I agree to pay a settlement amt, I receive letter stating they would accept if I could pay in one lump sum. 3 months trying to locate who the money goes to, no response from the business or their atty. Receive call today that they want full amt plus their atty fees. How can they justify me paying that amt. Example : Is not any different than me purchasing a vehicle, taking it to my neighbor and telling them they owe money on a car note and I am going to sue if they refuse to pay. Signed Very AGGRAVATED FORMER EMPLOYEE I am to the point where I would rather pay another atty more money just so I don’t have to pay these other pricks anything.
For the record I am in Louisiana

I remember when O was sued by the Texas beef Association (or something like that) – so would not this suit be similar if someone were to bring it if they could prove that he cost them real money and jobs?
(The O in my example is not that from television)

I’m going to sue someone. i should have no problem winning.
The person I am suing is part owner of a business (which has nothing to do with the suit)
If I win how can I collect and is there anything I can do to attache the Business. can I threaten it at all.

The suit would be against business policy and what they force employees to do. How do I get my voice out there to see if others feel as I do? How do I find an Attorney? I want to take those emineffers down!