<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has anyone ever won a case against a check advance business because of a technicality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/</link>
	<description>sportcoats and blazer discusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:32:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hexeliebe</title>
		<link>http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/comment-page-1/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>hexeliebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>If you would like an answer to your question, then don&#039;t you think it would be important to name the state where this occurred?  hexeliebe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you would like an answer to your question, then don&#8217;t you think it would be important to name the state where this occurred?  hexeliebe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarelda</title>
		<link>http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarelda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong but I thought that these were considered loans.  That you defaulted on a loan, not wrote a bad check.   Is that a part of this at all?  bad checks are worse than defaulting on a loan isnt it (legally I mean)  Sarelda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong but I thought that these were considered loans.  That you defaulted on a loan, not wrote a bad check.   Is that a part of this at all?  bad checks are worse than defaulting on a loan isnt it (legally I mean)  Sarelda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo is Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/comment-page-1/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo is Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestpricesuits.com/blog/has-anyone-ever-won-a-case-against-a-check-advance-business-because-of-a-technicality/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Read your paperwork. You probably signed something that waives their responsibility to send you that notice, and allows them to go right into litigation.  Yahoo is Stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your paperwork. You probably signed something that waives their responsibility to send you that notice, and allows them to go right into litigation.  Yahoo is Stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

